A 14-month "nightmare," as his sister calls it, has finally reached India's High Court. Bollywood actress Celina Jaitly has secured a landmark judicial directive demanding the Indian government provide immediate answers and legal aid for her brother, Retired Major Vikrant Jaitley , a decorated former paratrooper who has been detained in the United Arab Emirates ( UAE ) since September 2024.
The family’s anguished fight against what they call an "illegal abduction" has now forced the Ministry of External Affairs ( MEA ) to appoint a dedicated officer and ensure the severely injured veteran, held on unspecified charges, receives the legal help he needs. The court order, issued after Celina Jaitly pleaded she just wanted "direct contact" with the brother who "fought for us," transforms her private ordeal into a mandated diplomatic priority.
A Soldier and a Screen Star
This complex legal and diplomatic struggle pivots on two public figures from a distinguished military family.
The detainee at the centre of the case is Retired Major Vikrant Jaitley . He is a fourth-generation soldier and a veteran of the Indian Army 's elite forces, having served as a paratrooper from the 3 Para Special Forces. His service includes a tour with a UN peacekeeping mission in Lebanon, and he is a holder of the Chief of Army Staff Commendation for Gallantry. After retiring, he had resided in the UAE since 2016, working in trading and risk management with the MATITI Group.
His sister, the petitioner who brought the case to the Delhi High Court, is Celina Jaitly, a prominent figure in the Hindi film industry. A former beauty queen, she was crowned Femina Miss India 2001 and placed as the 4th runner-up at Miss Universe 2001. Her notable films include box office successes like No Entry (2005) and Golmaal Returns (2008). Her public profile has amplified the visibility of her brother's plight, turning a family crisis into a matter of national concern for veterans' welfare.
A special forces man in Abu Dhabi
The detention of Major Jaitley has become a profound test of diplomatic and legal recourse. His ordeal commenced on September 6, 2024, marking a period of over fourteen months of uncertainty. The circumstances remain opaque. His legal team alleges he was "illegally abducted" from outside the Mall of the Emirates by unidentifiable men in plain clothes and forced into an unmarked vehicle.
Crucially, the Centre’s counsel has only confirmed his arrest is connected to an "unspecified case," with some reports referencing alleged "national security concerns" in the UAE. For the initial eight months, the family alleges he was a victim of "enforced disappearance," only later confirming his transfer to a detention facility in Abu Dhabi, after which he received his detainee number.
A sister’s ordeal
Following the abrupt communication blackout, Celina Jaitly last spoke to her brother around Raksha Bandhan in August 2024, the actress exhausted every established governmental channel. She registered a grievance on the government’s MADAD Portal and sent multiple appeals to the Indian Embassy, Consulate, and the Minister of External Affairs. Yet, she claimed the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) had at one point marked her grievance as "closed," despite the unresolved situation.
Her subsequent petition to the Delhi High Court (HC) was a last recourse, seeking urgent intervention. Her plea highlighted serious concerns: Major Jaitley is reportedly suffering from cognitive decline and existing mission-related injuries. She argued the Indian government bears a "continuing constitutional and moral duty" to protect its citizens deprived of liberty abroad.
What has the UAE said so far?
The UAE government has issued no direct public statement regarding the detention of Retired Major Vikrant Jaitley, a fact central to the legal challenge. Information regarding his custody has only been relayed through the Indian Centre's counsel, confirming his arrest in connection with an "unspecified case" with some reports citing "national security concerns" within the UAE. Crucially, the UAE has provided no official documents detailing the specific charges, leaving the family and the court without clarity.
The sole confirmed official action is the granting of consular access to Indian diplomatic representatives on four occasions (May, June, August, and September 2025). The family, however, argues this access was "perfunctory," yielding no verifiable legal or medical details, which prompted the Indian court to order the MEA to press the UAE for substantive answers.
The High Court’s directive
The case, heard by Justice Sachin Datta on November 3, 2025, resulted in a definitive court order intended to break the information deadlock. The MEA did confirm that consular officials had been granted access to the Major on four occasions in May, June, August, and September 2025. However, Celina's counsel noted that the Major is estranged from his wife, making Celina his primary family representative.
The Delhi High Court issued a notice, demanding immediate action. The order specifically directed the MEA to:
The court has demanded a detailed status report from the MEA within four weeks, scheduling the next hearing for December 4, 2025. This legal action elevates the scrutiny from a family’s solitary struggle to a matter of state accountability.
The deadline looms
The court has demanded a detailed status report from the MEA within four weeks, scheduling the next hearing for December 4, 2025. This legal action elevates the scrutiny from a family’s solitary struggle to a matter of state accountability. The outcome will set a precedent for how the Indian government intervenes to secure the rights and welfare of its high-profile and military veterans facing protracted legal uncertainties in foreign jurisdictions.
The family’s anguished fight against what they call an "illegal abduction" has now forced the Ministry of External Affairs ( MEA ) to appoint a dedicated officer and ensure the severely injured veteran, held on unspecified charges, receives the legal help he needs. The court order, issued after Celina Jaitly pleaded she just wanted "direct contact" with the brother who "fought for us," transforms her private ordeal into a mandated diplomatic priority.
A Soldier and a Screen Star
This complex legal and diplomatic struggle pivots on two public figures from a distinguished military family.
The detainee at the centre of the case is Retired Major Vikrant Jaitley . He is a fourth-generation soldier and a veteran of the Indian Army 's elite forces, having served as a paratrooper from the 3 Para Special Forces. His service includes a tour with a UN peacekeeping mission in Lebanon, and he is a holder of the Chief of Army Staff Commendation for Gallantry. After retiring, he had resided in the UAE since 2016, working in trading and risk management with the MATITI Group.
His sister, the petitioner who brought the case to the Delhi High Court, is Celina Jaitly, a prominent figure in the Hindi film industry. A former beauty queen, she was crowned Femina Miss India 2001 and placed as the 4th runner-up at Miss Universe 2001. Her notable films include box office successes like No Entry (2005) and Golmaal Returns (2008). Her public profile has amplified the visibility of her brother's plight, turning a family crisis into a matter of national concern for veterans' welfare.
A special forces man in Abu Dhabi
The detention of Major Jaitley has become a profound test of diplomatic and legal recourse. His ordeal commenced on September 6, 2024, marking a period of over fourteen months of uncertainty. The circumstances remain opaque. His legal team alleges he was "illegally abducted" from outside the Mall of the Emirates by unidentifiable men in plain clothes and forced into an unmarked vehicle.
Crucially, the Centre’s counsel has only confirmed his arrest is connected to an "unspecified case," with some reports referencing alleged "national security concerns" in the UAE. For the initial eight months, the family alleges he was a victim of "enforced disappearance," only later confirming his transfer to a detention facility in Abu Dhabi, after which he received his detainee number.
A sister’s ordeal
Following the abrupt communication blackout, Celina Jaitly last spoke to her brother around Raksha Bandhan in August 2024, the actress exhausted every established governmental channel. She registered a grievance on the government’s MADAD Portal and sent multiple appeals to the Indian Embassy, Consulate, and the Minister of External Affairs. Yet, she claimed the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) had at one point marked her grievance as "closed," despite the unresolved situation.
Her subsequent petition to the Delhi High Court (HC) was a last recourse, seeking urgent intervention. Her plea highlighted serious concerns: Major Jaitley is reportedly suffering from cognitive decline and existing mission-related injuries. She argued the Indian government bears a "continuing constitutional and moral duty" to protect its citizens deprived of liberty abroad.
What has the UAE said so far?
The UAE government has issued no direct public statement regarding the detention of Retired Major Vikrant Jaitley, a fact central to the legal challenge. Information regarding his custody has only been relayed through the Indian Centre's counsel, confirming his arrest in connection with an "unspecified case" with some reports citing "national security concerns" within the UAE. Crucially, the UAE has provided no official documents detailing the specific charges, leaving the family and the court without clarity.
The sole confirmed official action is the granting of consular access to Indian diplomatic representatives on four occasions (May, June, August, and September 2025). The family, however, argues this access was "perfunctory," yielding no verifiable legal or medical details, which prompted the Indian court to order the MEA to press the UAE for substantive answers.
The High Court’s directive
The case, heard by Justice Sachin Datta on November 3, 2025, resulted in a definitive court order intended to break the information deadlock. The MEA did confirm that consular officials had been granted access to the Major on four occasions in May, June, August, and September 2025. However, Celina's counsel noted that the Major is estranged from his wife, making Celina his primary family representative.
The Delhi High Court issued a notice, demanding immediate action. The order specifically directed the MEA to:
- Appoint a Nodal Officer: To coordinate assistance and provide the family with regular, verifiable updates on his legal status.
- Facilitate Communication: To establish direct contact between Major Jaitley and his sister, Celina.
- Ensure Legal Representation: To provide effective legal representation for the retired Major in the UAE.
The court has demanded a detailed status report from the MEA within four weeks, scheduling the next hearing for December 4, 2025. This legal action elevates the scrutiny from a family’s solitary struggle to a matter of state accountability.
The deadline looms
The court has demanded a detailed status report from the MEA within four weeks, scheduling the next hearing for December 4, 2025. This legal action elevates the scrutiny from a family’s solitary struggle to a matter of state accountability. The outcome will set a precedent for how the Indian government intervenes to secure the rights and welfare of its high-profile and military veterans facing protracted legal uncertainties in foreign jurisdictions.
You may also like
Paul Gascoigne stepped in to help Celebrity Traitors star after he was physically attacked
Never here Keir! As Lammy loses the plot - could Starmer actually spend some time in UK?
We must change the DNA of capitalism to focus on legacy and not short-term returns
Royals 'amused' by Meghan Markle's acting return as expert delivers brutal blow to duchess
Footballer, 16, killed by stray bullet at home as mourning club pays emotional tribute
